Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Mar 22, 2002
  2. Dec 08, 2001
  3. Oct 31, 2001
  4. Oct 23, 2001
  5. Oct 20, 2001
  6. Sep 23, 2001
  7. Sep 14, 2001
  8. Sep 13, 2001
  9. Sep 03, 2001
  10. Jun 10, 2001
  11. May 30, 2001
  12. May 27, 2001
  13. Mar 25, 2001
  14. Mar 20, 2001
  15. Feb 04, 2001
  16. Jan 14, 2001
  17. Jan 08, 2001
  18. Dec 12, 2000
  19. Dec 08, 2000
  20. Oct 05, 2000
  21. Jul 22, 2000
  22. Jul 21, 2000
  23. Jun 23, 2000
    • Peter Eisentraut's avatar
      Second pass over run-time configuration system. Adjust priorities on some · c4465095
      Peter Eisentraut authored
      option settings. Sort out SIGHUP vs BACKEND -- there is no total ordering
      here, so make explicit checks. Add comments explaining all of this.
      Removed permissions check on SHOW command.
      
      Add examine_subclass to the game, rename to SQL_inheritance to fit the
      official data model better. Adjust documentation.
      
      Standalone backend needs to reset all options before it starts. To
      facilitate that, have IsUnderPostmaster be set by the postmaster itself,
      don't wait for the magic -p switch.
      
      Also make sure that all environment variables and argv's survive
      init_ps_display(). Use strdup where necessary.
      
      Have initdb make configuration files (postgresql.conf, pg_hba.conf) mode
      0600 -- having configuration files is no fun if you can't edit them.
      c4465095
  24. Jun 09, 2000
  25. Mar 27, 2000
  26. Mar 26, 2000
  27. Mar 16, 2000
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Tweak GROUP BY so that it will still accept result-column names, but only · 1763a7c1
      Tom Lane authored
      after trying to resolve the item as an input-column name.  This allows us
      to be compliant with the SQL92 spec for queries that fall within the spec,
      while still accepting the same out-of-spec queries as 6.5 did.  You'll only
      lose if there is an output column name that is the same as an input
      column name, but doesn't refer to the same value.  7.0 will interpret
      such a GROUP BY spec differently than 6.5 did.  No way around that, because
      6.5 was clearly not spec compliant.
      1763a7c1
  28. Feb 21, 2000
  29. Jan 27, 2000
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Redesign DISTINCT ON as discussed in pgsql-sql 1/25/00: syntax is now · dd979f66
      Tom Lane authored
      SELECT DISTINCT ON (expr [, expr ...]) targetlist ...
      and there is a check to make sure that the user didn't specify an ORDER BY
      that's incompatible with the DISTINCT operation.
      Reimplement nodeUnique and nodeGroup to use the proper datatype-specific
      equality function for each column being compared --- they used to do
      bitwise comparisons or convert the data to text strings and strcmp().
      (To add insult to injury, they'd look up the conversion functions once
      for each tuple...)  Parse/plan representation of DISTINCT is now a list
      of SortClause nodes.
      initdb forced by querytree change...
      dd979f66
  30. Dec 13, 1999
  31. Aug 06, 1999
  32. Jul 22, 1999
  33. Jul 16, 1999
  34. Jul 15, 1999
  35. Jul 14, 1999
  36. Jun 14, 1999
  37. Jun 03, 1999
  38. May 12, 1999
  39. May 10, 1999
  40. Apr 06, 1999
Loading