Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Jan 17, 2000
  2. Jan 10, 2000
  3. Dec 12, 1999
  4. Dec 10, 1999
  5. Nov 01, 1999
  6. Oct 07, 1999
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Fix planner and rewriter to follow SQL semantics for tables that are · 3eb1c822
      Tom Lane authored
      mentioned in FROM but not elsewhere in the query: such tables should be
      joined over anyway.  Aside from being more standards-compliant, this allows
      removal of some very ugly hacks for COUNT(*) processing.  Also, allow
      HAVING clause without aggregate functions, since SQL does.  Clean up
      CREATE RULE statement-list syntax the same way Bruce just fixed the
      main stmtmulti production.
      CAUTION: addition of a field to RangeTblEntry nodes breaks stored rules;
      you will have to initdb if you have any rules.
      3eb1c822
  7. Aug 24, 1999
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Remove bogus code in oper_exact --- if it didn't find an exact · a23faeee
      Tom Lane authored
      match then it tried for a self-commutative operator with the reversed input
      data types.  This is pretty silly; there could never be such an operator,
      except maybe in binary-compatible-type scenarios, and we have oper_inexact
      for that.  Besides which, the oprsanity regress test would complain about
      such an operator.  Remove nonfunctional code and simplify routine calling
      convention accordingly.
      a23faeee
  8. Aug 21, 1999
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Major revision of sort-node handling: push knowledge of query · db436adf
      Tom Lane authored
      sort order down into planner, instead of handling it only at the very top
      level of the planner.  This fixes many things.  An explicit sort is now
      avoided if there is a cheaper alternative (typically an indexscan) not
      only for ORDER BY, but also for the internal sort of GROUP BY.  It works
      even when there is no other reason (such as a WHERE condition) to consider
      the indexscan.  It works for indexes on functions.  It works for indexes
      on functions, backwards.  It's just so cool...
      
      CAUTION: I have changed the representation of SortClause nodes, therefore
      THIS UPDATE BREAKS STORED RULES.  You will need to initdb.
      db436adf
  9. Aug 05, 1999
  10. Jul 19, 1999
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Rewrite parser's handling of INSERT ... SELECT so that processing · 7f76eab1
      Tom Lane authored
      of the SELECT part of the statement is just like a plain SELECT.  All
      INSERT-specific processing happens after the SELECT parsing is done.
      This eliminates many problems, e.g. INSERT ... SELECT ... GROUP BY using
      the wrong column labels.  Ensure that DEFAULT clauses are coerced to
      the target column type, whether or not stored clause produces the right
      type.  Substantial cleanup of parser's array support.
      7f76eab1
  11. Jul 16, 1999
  12. Jul 15, 1999
  13. Jul 14, 1999
  14. Jul 13, 1999
  15. Jun 18, 1999
  16. May 29, 1999
  17. May 26, 1999
  18. May 25, 1999
  19. May 22, 1999
  20. May 17, 1999
  21. May 13, 1999
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      Rip out QueryTreeList structure, root and branch. Querytree · 507a0a2a
      Tom Lane authored
      lists are now plain old garden-variety Lists, allocated with palloc,
      rather than specialized expansible-array data allocated with malloc.
      This substantially simplifies their handling and eliminates several
      sources of memory leakage.
      Several basic types of erroneous queries (syntax error, attempt to
      insert a duplicate key into a unique index) now demonstrably leak
      zero bytes per query.
      507a0a2a
  22. Mar 10, 1999
  23. Feb 23, 1999
  24. Feb 14, 1999
  25. Feb 13, 1999
  26. Jan 24, 1999
  27. Jan 18, 1999
    • Bruce Momjian's avatar
      Hi! · bd8ffc6f
      Bruce Momjian authored
      INTERSECT and EXCEPT is available for postgresql-v6.4!
      
      The patch against v6.4 is included at the end of the current text
      (in uuencoded form!)
      
      I also included the text of my Master's Thesis. (a postscript
      version). I hope that you find something of it useful and would be
      happy if parts of it find their way into the PostgreSQL documentation
      project (If so, tell me, then I send the sources of the document!)
      
      The contents of the document are:
        -) The first chapter might be of less interest as it gives only an
           overview on SQL.
      
        -) The second chapter gives a description on much of PostgreSQL's
           features (like user defined types etc. and how to use these features)
      
        -) The third chapter starts with an overview of PostgreSQL's internal
           structure with focus on the stages a query has to pass (i.e. parser,
           planner/optimizer, executor). Then a detailed description of the
           implementation of the Having clause and the Intersect/Except logic is
           given.
      
      Originally I worked on v6.3.2 but never found time enough to prepare
      and post a patch. Now I applied the changes to v6.4 to get Intersect
      and Except working with the new version. Chapter 3 of my documentation
      deals with the changes against v6.3.2, so keep that in mind when
      comparing the parts of the code printed there with the patched sources
      of v6.4.
      
      Here are some remarks on the patch. There are some things that have
      still to be done but at the moment I don't have time to do them
      myself. (I'm doing my military service at the moment) Sorry for that
      :-(
      
      -) I used a rewrite technique for the implementation of the Except/Intersect
         logic which rewrites the query to a semantically equivalent query before
         it is handed to the rewrite system (for views, rules etc.), planner,
         executor etc.
      
      -) In v6.3.2 the types of the attributes of two select statements
         connected by the UNION keyword had to match 100%. In v6.4 the types
         only need to be familiar (i.e. int and float can be mixed). Since this
         feature did not exist when I worked on Intersect/Except it
         does not work correctly for Except/Intersect queries WHEN USED IN
         COMBINATION WITH UNIONS! (i.e. sometimes the wrong type is used for the
         resulting table. This is because until now the types of the attributes of
         the first select statement have been used for the resulting table.
         When Intersects and/or Excepts are used in combination with Unions it
         might happen, that the first select statement of the original query
         appears at another position in the query which will be executed. The reason
         for this is the technique used for the implementation of
         Except/Intersect which does a query rewrite!)
         NOTE: It is NOT broken for pure UNION queries and pure INTERSECT/EXCEPT
               queries!!!
      
      -) I had to add the field intersect_clause to some data structures
         but did not find time to implement printfuncs for the new field.
         This does NOT break the debug modes but when an Except/Intersect
         is used the query debug output will be the already rewritten query.
      
      -) Massive changes to the grammar rules for SELECT and INSERT statements
         have been necessary (see comments in gram.y and documentation for
         deatails) in order to be able to use mixed queries like
         (SELECT ... UNION (SELECT ... EXCEPT SELECT)) INTERSECT SELECT...;
      
      -) When using UNION/EXCEPT/INTERSECT you will get:
         NOTICE: equal: "Don't know if nodes of type xxx are equal".
         I did not have  time to add comparsion support for all the needed nodes,
         but the default behaviour of the function equal met my requirements.
         I did not dare to supress this message!
      
         That's the reason why the regression test for union will fail: These
         messages are also included in the union.out file!
      
      -) Somebody of you changed the union_planner() function for v6.4
         (I copied the targetlist to new_tlist and that was removed and
         replaced by a cleanup of the original targetlist). These chnages
         violated some having queries executed against views so I changed
         it back again. I did not have time to examine the differences between the
         two versions but now it works :-)
         If you want to find out, try the file queries/view_having.sql on
         both versions and compare the results . Two queries won't produce a
         correct result with your version.
      
      regards
      
          Stefan
      bd8ffc6f
  28. Dec 08, 1998
  29. Oct 22, 1998
  30. Oct 08, 1998
  31. Sep 01, 1998
  32. Aug 25, 1998
  33. Aug 14, 1998
  34. Aug 05, 1998
    • Marc G. Fournier's avatar
      · a1627a1d
      Marc G. Fournier authored
      From: David Hartwig <daybee@bellatlantic.net>
      
      I have attached a patch to allow GROUP BY and/or ORDER BY function or
      expressions.  Note worthy items:
      
      1. The expression or function need not be in the target list.
      Example:
                  SELECT  name FROM foo GROUP BY lower(name);
      
      2.   Simplified the grammar to use expressions only.
      
      3.  Cleaned up earlier patch in this area to make use of existing
      utility functions.
      
      3.  Reduced some of the members in the SortGroupBy parse node.   The
      original data members were redundant with the new expression node.
      (MUST do a "make clean" now)
      
      4.  Added a new parse node "JoinUsing".   The JOIN USING clause was
      overloading this SortGroupBy structure.   With the afore mentioned
      reduction of members, the two clauses lost all their commonality.
      
      5.  A bug still exist where, if a function or expression is GROUPed BY,
      and an aggregate function does not include a attribute from the
      expression or function, the backend crashes.   (or something like
      that)   The bug pre-dates this patch.    Example:
      
          SELECT lower(a) AS lowcase, count(b) FROM foo GROUP BY lowcase;
                       *** BOOM  ***
      
          --Also when not in target list
          SELECT  count(b) FROM foo GROUP BY lower(a);
                      *** BOOM  AGAIN ***
      a1627a1d
  35. Jul 12, 1998
  36. Jul 08, 1998
  37. Jun 05, 1998
  38. May 29, 1998
Loading