Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit fb341a7d authored by Amit Kapila's avatar Amit Kapila
Browse files

Fix oversight in commit 4429f6a9.

The test name and the following test cases suggest the index created
should be hash index, but it forgot to add 'using hash' in the test case.
This in itself won't improve code coverage as there were some other tests
which were covering the corresponding code.  However, it is better if the
added tests serve their actual purpose.

Reported-by: Paul A Jungwirth
Author: Paul A Jungwirth
Reviewed-by: Mahendra Singh
Backpatch-through: 9.4
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+renyV=Us-5XfMC25bNp-uWSj39XgHHmGE9Rh2cQKMegSj52g@mail.gmail.com
parent d10475a0
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ select numrange(1.0, 2.0) * numrange(2.5, 3.0);
(1 row)
create table numrange_test2(nr numrange);
create index numrange_test2_hash_idx on numrange_test2 (nr);
create index numrange_test2_hash_idx on numrange_test2 using hash (nr);
INSERT INTO numrange_test2 VALUES('[, 5)');
INSERT INTO numrange_test2 VALUES(numrange(1.1, 2.2));
INSERT INTO numrange_test2 VALUES(numrange(1.1, 2.2));
......
......@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ select numrange(1.0, 2.0) * numrange(1.5, 3.0);
select numrange(1.0, 2.0) * numrange(2.5, 3.0);
create table numrange_test2(nr numrange);
create index numrange_test2_hash_idx on numrange_test2 (nr);
create index numrange_test2_hash_idx on numrange_test2 using hash (nr);
INSERT INTO numrange_test2 VALUES('[, 5)');
INSERT INTO numrange_test2 VALUES(numrange(1.1, 2.2));
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment