Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
P
postgres-lambda-diff
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Jakob Huber
postgres-lambda-diff
Commits
cc9bcbc8
Commit
cc9bcbc8
authored
19 years ago
by
Tom Lane
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Improve outer-join-deduction logic to be able to propagate equalities
through multiple join clauses.
parent
76eca0ec
Branches
Branches containing commit
Tags
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
src/backend/optimizer/path/pathkeys.c
+202
-157
202 additions, 157 deletions
src/backend/optimizer/path/pathkeys.c
with
202 additions
and
157 deletions
src/backend/optimizer/path/pathkeys.c
+
202
−
157
View file @
cc9bcbc8
...
...
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/pathkeys.c,v 1.
69
2005/07/0
2 23:00:40
tgl Exp $
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/pathkeys.c,v 1.
70
2005/07/0
3 18:26:32
tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
...
...
@@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ static PathKeyItem *makePathKeyItem(Node *key, Oid sortop, bool checkType);
static
void
generate_outer_join_implications
(
PlannerInfo
*
root
,
List
*
equi_key_set
,
Relids
*
relids
);
static
void
sub_generate_join_implications
(
PlannerInfo
*
root
,
List
*
equi_key_set
,
Relids
*
relids
,
Node
*
item1
,
Oid
sortop1
,
Relids
item1_relids
);
static
void
process_implied_const_eq
(
PlannerInfo
*
root
,
List
*
equi_key_set
,
Relids
*
relids
,
Node
*
item1
,
Oid
sortop1
,
...
...
@@ -250,24 +254,16 @@ generate_implied_equalities(PlannerInfo *root)
i1
++
;
}
/*
* If we have constant(s) and outer joins, try to propagate the
* constants through outer-join quals.
*/
if
(
have_consts
&&
root
->
hasOuterJoins
)
generate_outer_join_implications
(
root
,
curset
,
relids
);
/*
* A set containing only two items cannot imply any equalities
* beyond the one that created the set, so we can skip it.
*/
if
(
nitems
<
3
)
continue
;
/*
* Match each item in the set with all that appear after it (it's
* sufficient to generate A=B, need not process B=A too).
*
* A set containing only two items cannot imply any equalities
* beyond the one that created the set, so we can skip this
* processing in that case.
*/
if
(
nitems
>=
3
)
{
i1
=
0
;
foreach
(
ptr1
,
curset
)
{
...
...
@@ -310,6 +306,14 @@ generate_implied_equalities(PlannerInfo *root)
i1
++
;
}
}
/*
* If we have constant(s) and outer joins, try to propagate the
* constants through outer-join quals.
*/
if
(
have_consts
&&
root
->
hasOuterJoins
)
generate_outer_join_implications
(
root
,
curset
,
relids
);
}
}
/*
...
...
@@ -362,118 +366,154 @@ generate_outer_join_implications(PlannerInfo *root,
List
*
equi_key_set
,
Relids
*
relids
)
{
ListCell
*
l1
;
ListCell
*
l
;
int
i
=
0
;
/* Process each non-constant element of equi_key_set */
foreach
(
l
,
equi_key_set
)
{
PathKeyItem
*
item1
=
(
PathKeyItem
*
)
lfirst
(
l
);
/* Examine each mergejoinable outer-join clause with OUTERVAR on left */
foreach
(
l1
,
root
->
left_join_clauses
)
if
(
!
bms_is_empty
(
relids
[
i
]))
{
RestrictInfo
*
rinfo
=
(
RestrictInfo
*
)
lfirst
(
l1
);
Node
*
leftop
=
get_leftop
(
rinfo
->
clause
);
Node
*
rightop
=
get_rightop
(
rinfo
->
clause
);
ListCell
*
l2
;
sub_generate_join_implications
(
root
,
equi_key_set
,
relids
,
item1
->
key
,
item1
->
sortop
,
relids
[
i
]);
}
i
++
;
}
}
/*
* sub_generate_join_implications
* Propagate a constant equality through outer join clauses.
*
* The item described by item1/sortop1/item1_relids has been determined
* to be equal to the constant(s) listed in equi_key_set. Recursively
* trace out the implications of this.
*
* equi_key_set and relids are as for generate_outer_join_implications.
*/
static
void
sub_generate_join_implications
(
PlannerInfo
*
root
,
List
*
equi_key_set
,
Relids
*
relids
,
Node
*
item1
,
Oid
sortop1
,
Relids
item1_relids
)
/* Scan to see if it matches any element of equi_key_set */
foreach
(
l2
,
equi_key_set
)
{
PathKeyItem
*
item1
=
(
PathKeyItem
*
)
lfirst
(
l2
)
;
ListCell
*
l
;
if
(
equal
(
leftop
,
item1
->
key
)
&&
rinfo
->
left_sortop
==
item1
->
sortop
)
/*
* Examine each mergejoinable outer-join clause with OUTERVAR on left,
* looking for an OUTERVAR identical to item1
*/
foreach
(
l
,
root
->
left_join_clauses
)
{
RestrictInfo
*
rinfo
=
(
RestrictInfo
*
)
lfirst
(
l
);
Node
*
leftop
=
get_leftop
(
rinfo
->
clause
);
if
(
equal
(
leftop
,
item1
)
&&
rinfo
->
left_sortop
==
sortop1
)
{
/*
*
Yes
, so find constant member(s) of set and generate
*
Match
, so find constant member(s) of set and generate
* implied INNERVAR = CONSTANT
*/
Node
*
rightop
=
get_rightop
(
rinfo
->
clause
);
process_implied_const_eq
(
root
,
equi_key_set
,
relids
,
rightop
,
rinfo
->
right_sortop
,
rinfo
->
right_relids
,
false
);
/*
* We can remove
the
explicit outer
join qual, too,
* We can remove explicit
tests of this
outer
-
join qual, too,
* since we now have tests forcing each of its sides
* to the same value.
*/
process_implied_equality
(
root
,
leftop
,
leftop
,
rightop
,
rinfo
->
left_sortop
,
rinfo
->
right_sortop
,
rinfo
->
left_relids
,
rinfo
->
right_relids
,
true
);
/*
* And recurse to see if we can deduce anything from
* INNERVAR = CONSTANT
*/
sub_generate_join_implications
(
root
,
equi_key_set
,
relids
,
rightop
,
rinfo
->
left_sortop
,
rinfo
->
right_sortop
,
rinfo
->
left_relids
,
rinfo
->
right_relids
,
true
);
/* No need to match against remaining set members */
break
;
}
rinfo
->
right_relids
);
}
}
/*
Examine each mergejoinable outer-join
clause with OUTERVAR on right */
foreach
(
l
1
,
root
->
right_join_clauses
)
/*
The same, looking at
clause
s
with OUTERVAR on right */
foreach
(
l
,
root
->
right_join_clauses
)
{
RestrictInfo
*
rinfo
=
(
RestrictInfo
*
)
lfirst
(
l1
);
Node
*
leftop
=
get_leftop
(
rinfo
->
clause
);
RestrictInfo
*
rinfo
=
(
RestrictInfo
*
)
lfirst
(
l
);
Node
*
rightop
=
get_rightop
(
rinfo
->
clause
);
ListCell
*
l2
;
/* Scan to see if it matches any element of equi_key_set */
foreach
(
l2
,
equi_key_set
)
{
PathKeyItem
*
item1
=
(
PathKeyItem
*
)
lfirst
(
l2
);
if
(
equal
(
rightop
,
item1
->
key
)
&&
rinfo
->
right_sortop
==
item1
->
sortop
)
if
(
equal
(
rightop
,
item1
)
&&
rinfo
->
right_sortop
==
sortop1
)
{
/*
*
Yes
, so find constant member(s) of set and generate
*
Match
, so find constant member(s) of set and generate
* implied INNERVAR = CONSTANT
*/
Node
*
leftop
=
get_leftop
(
rinfo
->
clause
);
process_implied_const_eq
(
root
,
equi_key_set
,
relids
,
leftop
,
rinfo
->
left_sortop
,
rinfo
->
left_relids
,
false
);
/*
* We can remove
the
explicit outer
join qual, too,
* We can remove explicit
tests of this
outer
-
join qual, too,
* since we now have tests forcing each of its sides
* to the same value.
*/
process_implied_equality
(
root
,
leftop
,
rightop
,
rinfo
->
left_sortop
,
rinfo
->
right_sortop
,
rinfo
->
left_relids
,
rinfo
->
right_relids
,
true
);
/*
* And recurse to see if we can deduce anything from
* INNERVAR = CONSTANT
*/
sub_generate_join_implications
(
root
,
equi_key_set
,
relids
,
leftop
,
rightop
,
rinfo
->
left_sortop
,
rinfo
->
right_sortop
,
rinfo
->
left_relids
,
rinfo
->
right_relids
,
true
);
/* No need to match against remaining set members */
break
;
}
rinfo
->
left_relids
);
}
}
/* Examine each mergejoinable full-join clause */
foreach
(
l1
,
root
->
full_join_clauses
)
/*
* Only COALESCE(x,y) items can possibly match full joins
*/
if
(
IsA
(
item1
,
CoalesceExpr
))
{
RestrictInfo
*
rinfo
=
(
RestrictInfo
*
)
lfirst
(
l1
);
Node
*
leftop
=
get_leftop
(
rinfo
->
clause
);
Node
*
rightop
=
get_rightop
(
rinfo
->
clause
);
int
i1
=
0
;
ListCell
*
l2
;
CoalesceExpr
*
cexpr
=
(
CoalesceExpr
*
)
item1
;
Node
*
cfirst
;
Node
*
csecond
;
/* Scan to see if it matches any element of equi_key_set */
foreach
(
l2
,
equi_key_set
)
if
(
list_length
(
cexpr
->
args
)
!=
2
)
return
;
cfirst
=
(
Node
*
)
linitial
(
cexpr
->
args
);
csecond
=
(
Node
*
)
lsecond
(
cexpr
->
args
);
/*
* Examine each mergejoinable full-join clause, looking for a
* clause of the form "x = y" matching the COALESCE(x,y) expression
*/
foreach
(
l
,
root
->
full_join_clauses
)
{
PathKeyItem
*
item1
=
(
PathKeyItem
*
)
lfirst
(
l2
);
CoalesceExpr
*
cexpr
=
(
CoalesceExpr
*
)
item1
->
key
;
RestrictInfo
*
rinfo
=
(
RestrictInfo
*
)
lfirst
(
l
);
Node
*
leftop
=
get_leftop
(
rinfo
->
clause
);
Node
*
rightop
=
get_rightop
(
rinfo
->
clause
);
/*
* Try to match a pathkey containing a COALESCE() expression
* to the join clause. We can assume the COALESCE() inputs
* are in the same order as the join clause, since both were
* automatically generated in the cases we care about.
* We can assume the COALESCE() inputs are in the same order
* as the join clause, since both were automatically generated
* in the cases we care about.
*
* XXX currently this may fail to match in cross-type cases
* because the COALESCE will contain typecast operations while
...
...
@@ -482,15 +522,13 @@ generate_outer_join_implications(PlannerInfo *root,
* Is it OK to strip implicit coercions from the COALESCE
* arguments? What of the sortops in such cases?
*/
if
(
IsA
(
cexpr
,
CoalesceExpr
)
&&
list_length
(
cexpr
->
args
)
==
2
&&
equal
(
leftop
,
(
Node
*
)
linitial
(
cexpr
->
args
))
&&
equal
(
rightop
,
(
Node
*
)
lsecond
(
cexpr
->
args
))
&&
rinfo
->
left_sortop
==
item1
->
sortop
&&
rinfo
->
right_sortop
==
item1
->
sortop
)
if
(
equal
(
leftop
,
cfirst
)
&&
equal
(
rightop
,
csecond
)
&&
rinfo
->
left_sortop
==
sortop1
&&
rinfo
->
right_sortop
==
sortop1
)
{
/*
*
Yes
, so find constant member(s) of set and generate
*
Match
, so find constant member(s) of set and generate
* implied LEFTVAR = CONSTANT
*/
process_implied_const_eq
(
root
,
equi_key_set
,
relids
,
...
...
@@ -506,28 +544,37 @@ generate_outer_join_implications(PlannerInfo *root,
false
);
/* ... and remove COALESCE() = CONSTANT */
process_implied_const_eq
(
root
,
equi_key_set
,
relids
,
item1
->
key
,
item1
->
sortop
,
relids
[
i1
]
,
item1
,
sortop
1
,
item1_
relids
,
true
);
/*
* We can remove
the
explicit outer
join qual, too,
* We can remove explicit
tests of this
outer
-
join qual, too,
* since we now have tests forcing each of its sides
* to the same value.
*/
process_implied_equality
(
root
,
leftop
,
rightop
,
leftop
,
rightop
,
rinfo
->
left_sortop
,
rinfo
->
right_sortop
,
rinfo
->
left_relids
,
rinfo
->
right_relids
,
true
);
/*
* And recurse to see if we can deduce anything from
* LEFTVAR = CONSTANT
*/
sub_generate_join_implications
(
root
,
equi_key_set
,
relids
,
leftop
,
rinfo
->
left_sortop
,
rinfo
->
left_relids
);
/* ... and RIGHTVAR = CONSTANT */
sub_generate_join_implications
(
root
,
equi_key_set
,
relids
,
rightop
,
rinfo
->
right_sortop
,
rinfo
->
right_relids
);
/* No need to match against remaining set members */
break
;
}
i1
++
;
}
}
}
...
...
@@ -537,10 +584,8 @@ generate_outer_join_implications(PlannerInfo *root,
* Apply process_implied_equality with the given item and each
* pseudoconstant member of equi_key_set.
*
* This is just a subroutine to save some cruft in
* generate_outer_join_implications. equi_key_set and relids are as in
* generate_outer_join_implications, the other parameters as for
* process_implied_equality.
* equi_key_set and relids are as for generate_outer_join_implications,
* the other parameters as for process_implied_equality.
*/
static
void
process_implied_const_eq
(
PlannerInfo
*
root
,
List
*
equi_key_set
,
Relids
*
relids
,
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment