Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
P
postgres-lambda-diff
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Jakob Huber
postgres-lambda-diff
Commits
b9deede2
Commit
b9deede2
authored
21 years ago
by
Dave Cramer
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
fixed up OID74 test to conform with other tests, by Kris Jurka
parent
e9aec817
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/test/jdbc2/OID74Test.java
+80
-99
80 additions, 99 deletions
src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/test/jdbc2/OID74Test.java
with
80 additions
and
99 deletions
src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/test/jdbc2/OID74Test.java
+
80
−
99
View file @
b9deede2
...
...
@@ -7,18 +7,17 @@ import java.sql.*;
import
java.io.ByteArrayInputStream
;
import
java.io.InputStream
;
import
java.util.Properties
;
import
java.sql.*
;
/**
* User: alexei
* Date: 17-Dec-2003
* Time: 11:01:44
* @version $Id: OID74Test.java,v 1.
2
2003/12/1
7 15:45:05
davec Exp $
* @version $Id: OID74Test.java,v 1.
3
2003/12/1
8 04:08:30
davec Exp $
*/
public
class
OID74Test
extends
TestCase
{
private
Connection
con
;
public
OID74Test
(
String
name
)
{
...
...
@@ -30,36 +29,23 @@ public class OID74Test extends TestCase
public
void
tearDown
()
throws
Exception
{
}
public
void
testBinaryStream
()
public
void
testBinaryStream
()
throws
SQLException
{
//set up conection here
Connection
c
=
null
;
Properties
props
=
new
Properties
();
props
.
setProperty
(
"compatible"
,
"7.1"
);
Connection
c
=
TestUtil
.
openDB
(
props
);
c
.
setAutoCommit
(
false
);
TestUtil
.
createTable
(
c
,
"temp"
,
"col oid"
);
Statement
st
=
null
;
try
{
c
=
DriverManager
.
getConnection
(
"jdbc:postgresql://localhost/test?compatible=7.1&user=test"
);
c
.
setAutoCommit
(
false
);
st
=
c
.
createStatement
();
st
.
execute
(
"CREATE temp TABLE temp (col oid)"
);
}
catch
(
SQLException
e
)
{
//another issue: when connecting to 7.3 database and this exception occurs because the table already exists,
//st.setBinaryStream throws internal error in LargeObjectManager initialisation code
fail
(
"table creating error, probably already exists, code="
+
e
.
getErrorCode
());
}
finally
{
try
{
if
(
st
!=
null
)
st
.
close
();
}
catch
(
SQLException
ex
){};
}
PreparedStatement
pstmt
=
null
;
try
{
pstmt
=
c
.
prepareStatement
(
"INSERT INTO temp VALUES (?)"
);
//in case of 7.4 server, should block here
pstmt
.
setBinaryStream
(
1
,
new
ByteArrayInputStream
(
new
byte
[]{
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
}),
5
);
assertTrue
(
(
pstmt
.
executeUpdate
()
==
1
)
);
pstmt
.
close
();
...
...
@@ -69,13 +55,13 @@ public class OID74Test extends TestCase
assertTrue
(
"No results from query"
,
rs
.
next
()
);
//in case of 7.4 server, should block here
InputStream
in
=
rs
.
getBinaryStream
(
1
);
int
data
;
int
i
=
1
;
while
((
data
=
in
.
read
())
!=
-
1
)
System
.
out
.
println
(
data
);
assertEquals
(
data
,
i
++
);
rs
.
close
();
s
t
.
close
();
pstm
t
.
close
();
c
.
createStatement
().
executeUpdate
(
"DELETE FROM temp"
);
c
.
commit
();
}
...
...
@@ -87,13 +73,8 @@ public class OID74Test extends TestCase
{
fail
(
ex
.
getMessage
()
);
}
finally
{
try
{
if
(
c
!=
null
)
c
.
close
();
}
catch
(
SQLException
e1
){}
}
TestUtil
.
dropTable
(
c
,
"temp"
);
TestUtil
.
closeDB
(
c
);
}
}
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment