Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit b48437d1 authored by Heikki Linnakangas's avatar Heikki Linnakangas
Browse files

Fix off-by-one error in Assertion.

The point of the assertion is to ensure that the arrays allocated in stack
are large enough, but the check was one item short.

This won't matter in practice because MaxIndexTuplesPerPage is an
overestimate, so you can't have that many items on a page in reality.
But let's be tidy.

Spotted by Anastasia Lubennikova. Backpatch to all supported versions, like
the patch that added the assertion.
parent 0b28ea79
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
...@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ PageIndexMultiDelete(Page page, OffsetNumber *itemnos, int nitems) ...@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ PageIndexMultiDelete(Page page, OffsetNumber *itemnos, int nitems)
int nextitm; int nextitm;
OffsetNumber offnum; OffsetNumber offnum;
Assert(nitems < MaxIndexTuplesPerPage); Assert(nitems <= MaxIndexTuplesPerPage);
/* /*
* If there aren't very many items to delete, then retail * If there aren't very many items to delete, then retail
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment