Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit b04b0163 authored by Thomas G. Lockhart's avatar Thomas G. Lockhart
Browse files

Remove disclaimer about exact numeric types. They work now!

parent 8a3c7535
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -364,15 +364,10 @@ The sequence will remain in the database until explicitly dropped using
</caution>
</para>
<para>
The <firstterm>exact numerics</firstterm> <type>decimal</type> and
<type>numeric</type>
have fully implemented syntax but currently
(<productname>Postgres</productname> v6.4)
support only a small range of precision and/or range values.
The <type>int8</type> type may not be available on all platforms since
it relies on compiler support for this.
</para>
<para>
The <type>int8</type> type may not be available on all platforms since
it relies on compiler support for this.
</para>
</sect1>
......@@ -412,14 +407,10 @@ then the money type should use the monetary conventions defined for
</table>
</para>
<para>
<type>numeric</type>
should eventually replace the money type. It has a
fully implemented syntax but currently
(<productname>Postgres</productname> v6.4)
support only a small range of precision and/or range values
and cannot adequately substitute for the money type.
</para>
<para>
<type>numeric</type>
will replace the money type, and should be preferred.
</para>
</sect1>
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment