> Am Son, 2003-06-22 um 02.09 schrieb Joe Conway:
>>Sounds like all that's needed for your case. But to be complete, in >>addition to changing tablefunc.c we'd have to: >>1) come up with a new function call signature that makes sense and does >>not cause backward compatibility problems for other people >>2) make needed changes to tablefunc.sql.in >>3) adjust the README.tablefunc appropriately >>4) adjust the regression test for new functionality >>5) be sure we don't break any of the old cases >> >>If you want to submit a complete patch, it would be gratefully accepted >>-- for review at least ;-) > > Here's the patch, at least for steps 1-3 Nabil Sayegh Joe Conway
Showing
- contrib/tablefunc/README.tablefunc 66 additions, 17 deletionscontrib/tablefunc/README.tablefunc
- contrib/tablefunc/data/connectby_text.data 9 additions, 9 deletionscontrib/tablefunc/data/connectby_text.data
- contrib/tablefunc/expected/tablefunc.out 27 additions, 3 deletionscontrib/tablefunc/expected/tablefunc.out
- contrib/tablefunc/sql/tablefunc.sql 9 additions, 3 deletionscontrib/tablefunc/sql/tablefunc.sql
- contrib/tablefunc/tablefunc.c 183 additions, 29 deletionscontrib/tablefunc/tablefunc.c
- contrib/tablefunc/tablefunc.h 3 additions, 0 deletionscontrib/tablefunc/tablefunc.h
- contrib/tablefunc/tablefunc.sql.in 12 additions, 0 deletionscontrib/tablefunc/tablefunc.sql.in
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment