Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 9b178555 authored by Tom Lane's avatar Tom Lane
Browse files

Per previous discussions, get rid of use of sync(2) in favor of

explicitly fsync'ing every (non-temp) file we have written since the
last checkpoint.  In the vast majority of cases, the burden of the
fsyncs should fall on the bgwriter process not on backends.  (To this
end, we assume that an fsync issued by the bgwriter will force out
blocks written to the same file by other processes using other file
descriptors.  Anyone have a problem with that?)  This makes the world
safe for WIN32, which ain't even got sync(2), and really makes the world
safe for Unixen as well, because sync(2) never had the semantics we need:
it offers no way to wait for the requested I/O to finish.

Along the way, fix a bug I recently introduced in xlog recovery:
file truncation replay failed to clear bufmgr buffers for the dropped
blocks, which could result in 'PANIC:  heap_delete_redo: no block'
later on in xlog replay.
parent f024086d
No related branches found
No related tags found
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment