> Actually, if you submit a patch that says either "SCROLL is the

default"
> or "NO SCROLL is the default", it will be rejected as incorrect.  The
> reason is that the default behavior is different from either of these,
> as is explained in the NOTES section.

Ok, so *that's* where the bit about the query plan being simple enough.
Based on that, ISTM that it should be premissable for us to decide that
a cursor requiring a sort isn't "simple enough" to support SCROLL.

In any case, here's a patch that makes the non-standard behavior easier
for people to find.

Jim C. Nasby