Done:

> * -Allow ORDER BY ... LIMIT # to select high/low value without sort or
<
<   Right now, if no index exists, ORDER BY ... LIMIT # requires we sort
<   all values to return the high/low value.  Instead The idea is to do a
<   sequential scan to find the high/low value, thus avoiding the sort.
<   MIN/MAX already does this, but not for LIMIT > 1.
<