Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 556110f4 authored by Tom Lane's avatar Tom Lane
Browse files

copy_relation_data was mistakenly assuming that the source relation

would always be already open at the smgr level.  Per bug report from
Fabien Coelho.
parent b4456e6d
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c,v 1.129 2004/08/29 05:06:41 momjian Exp $
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c,v 1.130 2004/08/31 15:56:39 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
......@@ -5434,7 +5434,7 @@ ATExecSetTableSpace(Oid tableOid, Oid newTableSpace)
static void
copy_relation_data(Relation rel, SMgrRelation dst)
{
SMgrRelation src = rel->rd_smgr;
SMgrRelation src;
bool use_wal;
BlockNumber nblocks;
BlockNumber blkno;
......@@ -5457,6 +5457,9 @@ copy_relation_data(Relation rel, SMgrRelation dst)
use_wal = XLogArchivingActive() && !rel->rd_istemp;
nblocks = RelationGetNumberOfBlocks(rel);
/* RelationGetNumberOfBlocks will certainly have opened rd_smgr */
src = rel->rd_smgr;
for (blkno = 0; blkno < nblocks; blkno++)
{
smgrread(src, blkno, buf);
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment