Fix reindexing of pg_class indexes some more.

Commits 3dbb317d et al failed under CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS testing.
Investigation showed that to reindex pg_class_oid_index, we must
suppress accesses to the index (via SetReindexProcessing) before we call
RelationSetNewRelfilenode, or at least before we do CommandCounterIncrement
therein; otherwise, relcache reloads happening within the CCI may try to
fetch pg_class rows using the index's new relfilenode value, which is as
yet an empty file.

Of course, the point of 3dbb317d was that that ordering didn't work
either, because then RelationSetNewRelfilenode's own update of the index's
pg_class row cannot access the index, should it need to.

There are various ways we might have got around that, but Andres Freund
came up with a brilliant solution: for a mapped index, we can really just
skip the pg_class update altogether.  The only fields it was actually
changing were relpages etc, but it was just setting them to zeroes which
is useless make-work.  (Correct new values will be installed at the end
of index build.)  All pg_class indexes are mapped and probably always will
be, so this eliminates the problem by removing work rather than adding it,
always a pleasant outcome.  Having taught RelationSetNewRelfilenode to do
it that way, we can revert the code reordering in reindex_index.  (But
I left the moved setup code where it was; there seems no reason why it
has to run without use of the old index.  If you're trying to fix a
busted pg_class index, you'll have had to disable system index use
altogether to get this far.)

Moreover, this means we don't need RelationSetIndexList at all, because
reindex_relation's hacking to make "REINDEX TABLE pg_class" work is
likewise now unnecessary.  We'll leave that code in place in the back
branches, but a follow-on patch will remove it in HEAD.

In passing, do some minor cleanup for commit 5c156060 (in HEAD only),
notably removing a duplicate newrnode assignment.

Patch by me, using a core idea due to Andres Freund.  Back-patch to all
supported branches, as 3dbb317d was.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28926.1556664156@sss.pgh.pa.us