Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 05e83968 authored by Tom Lane's avatar Tom Lane
Browse files

Clean up ill-advised attempt to invent a private set of Node tags.

Somebody thought it'd be cute to invent a set of Node tag numbers that were
defined independently of, and indeed conflicting with, the main tag-number
list.  While this accidentally failed to fail so far, it would certainly
lead to trouble as soon as anyone wanted to, say, apply copyObject to these
node types.  Clang was already complaining about the use of makeNode on
these tags, and I think quite rightly so.  Fix by pushing these node
definitions into the mainstream, including putting replnodes.h where it
belongs.
parent ffcf5a6c
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment