Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
  • benchmark-tools
  • postgres-lambda
  • master default
  • REL9_4_25
  • REL9_5_20
  • REL9_6_16
  • REL_10_11
  • REL_11_6
  • REL_12_1
  • REL_12_0
  • REL_12_RC1
  • REL_12_BETA4
  • REL9_4_24
  • REL9_5_19
  • REL9_6_15
  • REL_10_10
  • REL_11_5
  • REL_12_BETA3
  • REL9_4_23
  • REL9_5_18
  • REL9_6_14
  • REL_10_9
  • REL_11_4
23 results

postgres_fdw.sql

Blame
    • Tom Lane's avatar
      cb1ca4d8
      Allow foreign tables to participate in inheritance. · cb1ca4d8
      Tom Lane authored
      Foreign tables can now be inheritance children, or parents.  Much of the
      system was already ready for this, but we had to fix a few things of
      course, mostly in the area of planner and executor handling of row locks.
      
      As side effects of this, allow foreign tables to have NOT VALID CHECK
      constraints (and hence to accept ALTER ... VALIDATE CONSTRAINT), and to
      accept ALTER SET STORAGE and ALTER SET WITH/WITHOUT OIDS.  Continuing to
      disallow these things would've required bizarre and inconsistent special
      cases in inheritance behavior.  Since foreign tables don't enforce CHECK
      constraints anyway, a NOT VALID one is a complete no-op, but that doesn't
      mean we shouldn't allow it.  And it's possible that some FDWs might have
      use for SET STORAGE or SET WITH OIDS, though doubtless they will be no-ops
      for most.
      
      An additional change in support of this is that when a ModifyTable node
      has multiple target tables, they will all now be explicitly identified
      in EXPLAIN output, for example:
      
       Update on pt1  (cost=0.00..321.05 rows=3541 width=46)
         Update on pt1
         Foreign Update on ft1
         Foreign Update on ft2
         Update on child3
         ->  Seq Scan on pt1  (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=46)
         ->  Foreign Scan on ft1  (cost=100.00..148.03 rows=1170 width=46)
         ->  Foreign Scan on ft2  (cost=100.00..148.03 rows=1170 width=46)
         ->  Seq Scan on child3  (cost=0.00..25.00 rows=1200 width=46)
      
      This was done mainly to provide an unambiguous place to attach "Remote SQL"
      fields, but it is useful for inherited updates even when no foreign tables
      are involved.
      
      Shigeru Hanada and Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat and Kyotaro
      Horiguchi, some additional hacking by me
      cb1ca4d8
      History
      Allow foreign tables to participate in inheritance.
      Tom Lane authored
      Foreign tables can now be inheritance children, or parents.  Much of the
      system was already ready for this, but we had to fix a few things of
      course, mostly in the area of planner and executor handling of row locks.
      
      As side effects of this, allow foreign tables to have NOT VALID CHECK
      constraints (and hence to accept ALTER ... VALIDATE CONSTRAINT), and to
      accept ALTER SET STORAGE and ALTER SET WITH/WITHOUT OIDS.  Continuing to
      disallow these things would've required bizarre and inconsistent special
      cases in inheritance behavior.  Since foreign tables don't enforce CHECK
      constraints anyway, a NOT VALID one is a complete no-op, but that doesn't
      mean we shouldn't allow it.  And it's possible that some FDWs might have
      use for SET STORAGE or SET WITH OIDS, though doubtless they will be no-ops
      for most.
      
      An additional change in support of this is that when a ModifyTable node
      has multiple target tables, they will all now be explicitly identified
      in EXPLAIN output, for example:
      
       Update on pt1  (cost=0.00..321.05 rows=3541 width=46)
         Update on pt1
         Foreign Update on ft1
         Foreign Update on ft2
         Update on child3
         ->  Seq Scan on pt1  (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=46)
         ->  Foreign Scan on ft1  (cost=100.00..148.03 rows=1170 width=46)
         ->  Foreign Scan on ft2  (cost=100.00..148.03 rows=1170 width=46)
         ->  Seq Scan on child3  (cost=0.00..25.00 rows=1200 width=46)
      
      This was done mainly to provide an unambiguous place to attach "Remote SQL"
      fields, but it is useful for inherited updates even when no foreign tables
      are involved.
      
      Shigeru Hanada and Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat and Kyotaro
      Horiguchi, some additional hacking by me
    postgres_fdw.sql 28.79 KiB