Select Git revision
-
Tom Lane authored
Turns out that use of ShareUpdateExclusiveLock or ShareRowExclusiveLock to protect DDL changes had gotten copied into several places that were not touched by either of Simon's original patches for the feature, and thus neither he nor I thought to revert them. (Indeed, it appears that two of these uses were committed *after* the reversion, which just goes to show that git merging is no panacea.) Change these places to use AccessExclusiveLock again. If we ever manage to resurrect that feature, we're going to have to think a bit harder about how to keep lock level usage in sync for DDL operations that aren't within the AlterTable infrastructure. Two of these bugs are only in HEAD, but one is in the 9.1 branch too. Alvaro found one of them, I found the other two.
Tom Lane authoredTurns out that use of ShareUpdateExclusiveLock or ShareRowExclusiveLock to protect DDL changes had gotten copied into several places that were not touched by either of Simon's original patches for the feature, and thus neither he nor I thought to revert them. (Indeed, it appears that two of these uses were committed *after* the reversion, which just goes to show that git merging is no panacea.) Change these places to use AccessExclusiveLock again. If we ever manage to resurrect that feature, we're going to have to think a bit harder about how to keep lock level usage in sync for DDL operations that aren't within the AlterTable infrastructure. Two of these bugs are only in HEAD, but one is in the 9.1 branch too. Alvaro found one of them, I found the other two.
