Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
  • 022ece2cf1917f884692fb7167bf367ddb0ff410
  • master default
  • benchmark-tools
  • postgres-lambda
  • REL9_4_25
  • REL9_5_20
  • REL9_6_16
  • REL_10_11
  • REL_11_6
  • REL_12_1
  • REL_12_0
  • REL_12_RC1
  • REL_12_BETA4
  • REL9_4_24
  • REL9_5_19
  • REL9_6_15
  • REL_10_10
  • REL_11_5
  • REL_12_BETA3
  • REL9_4_23
  • REL9_5_18
  • REL9_6_14
  • REL_10_9
  • REL_11_4
24 results

backend

user avatar
Tom Lane authored
of AND and OR clauses.  The key point here is that an OR on the
predicate side has to be treated gingerly: we may be able to prove
that the OR is implied even when no one of its components is implied.
For example (x OR y) implies (x OR y OR z) even though no one of x,
y, or z can be individually proven.  This code handles both the
example shown recently by Sergey Koshcheyev and the one shown last
October by Dawid Kuroczko.
3104a928
History