From f71a299c6cb87ac17b51ee1b9e389ae5a31b86fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:54:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] doc: fix plurality typo on bgwriter doc sentence
Reported-by: matthew.alton@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/157204060717.1042.8194076510523669244@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 9.4
---
doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml
index bc5a52584b9..2bfc6eb9439 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
There are considerable robustness and security risks in using background
worker processes because, being written in the <literal>C</literal> language,
they have unrestricted access to data. Administrators wishing to enable
- modules that include background worker process should exercise extreme
+ modules that include background worker processs should exercise extreme
caution. Only carefully audited modules should be permitted to run
background worker processes.
</para>
--
GitLab