From ed5d55dafe96627fe810dec80ccba98df0b6834b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:53:37 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix a bug in the original implementation of
 redundant-join-clause removal: clauses in which one side or the other
 references both sides of the join cannot be removed as redundant, because
 that expression won't have been constrained below the join.  Per report from
 Sergey Burladyan.

CVS HEAD does not contain this bug due to EquivalenceClass rewrite, but it
seems wise to include the regression test for it anyway.
---
 src/test/regress/expected/join.out   | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 src/test/regress/expected/join_1.out | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 src/test/regress/sql/join.sql        | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/join.out
index 8b6716def81..3b7bdd9cbb3 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/join.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/join.out
@@ -2250,3 +2250,19 @@ WHERE d.f1 IS NULL;
  9999
 (3 rows)
 
+--
+-- regression test for problems of the sort depicted in bug #3494
+--
+create temp table tt5(f1 int, f2 int);
+create temp table tt6(f1 int, f2 int);
+insert into tt5 values(1, 10);
+insert into tt5 values(1, 11);
+insert into tt6 values(1, 9);
+insert into tt6 values(1, 2);
+insert into tt6 values(2, 9);
+select * from tt5,tt6 where tt5.f1 = tt6.f1 and tt5.f1 = tt5.f2 - tt6.f2;
+ f1 | f2 | f1 | f2 
+----+----+----+----
+  1 | 10 |  1 |  9
+(1 row)
+
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/join_1.out b/src/test/regress/expected/join_1.out
index 8e7e4de0141..f1bf4b9af26 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/join_1.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/join_1.out
@@ -2250,3 +2250,19 @@ WHERE d.f1 IS NULL;
  9999
 (3 rows)
 
+--
+-- regression test for problems of the sort depicted in bug #3494
+--
+create temp table tt5(f1 int, f2 int);
+create temp table tt6(f1 int, f2 int);
+insert into tt5 values(1, 10);
+insert into tt5 values(1, 11);
+insert into tt6 values(1, 9);
+insert into tt6 values(1, 2);
+insert into tt6 values(2, 9);
+select * from tt5,tt6 where tt5.f1 = tt6.f1 and tt5.f1 = tt5.f2 - tt6.f2;
+ f1 | f2 | f1 | f2 
+----+----+----+----
+  1 | 10 |  1 |  9
+(1 row)
+
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql
index d3433effd11..ad8957cd6e3 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql
@@ -424,3 +424,19 @@ LEFT JOIN (
         WHERE c.f1 IS NULL
 ) AS d ON (a.f1 = d.f1)
 WHERE d.f1 IS NULL;
+
+--
+-- regression test for problems of the sort depicted in bug #3494
+--
+
+create temp table tt5(f1 int, f2 int);
+create temp table tt6(f1 int, f2 int);
+
+insert into tt5 values(1, 10);
+insert into tt5 values(1, 11);
+
+insert into tt6 values(1, 9);
+insert into tt6 values(1, 2);
+insert into tt6 values(2, 9);
+
+select * from tt5,tt6 where tt5.f1 = tt6.f1 and tt5.f1 = tt5.f2 - tt6.f2;
-- 
GitLab