From e07cfef34d8e2f74e0d28f3e8b4384ee660aa9e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 11:53:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Re-Align *_freeze_max_age reloption limits with corresponding
GUC limits.
In 020235a5754 I lowered the autovacuum_*freeze_max_age minimums to
allow for easier testing of wraparounds. I did not touch the
corresponding per-table limits. While those don't matter for the purpose
of wraparound, it seems more consistent to lower them as well.
It's noteworthy that the previous reloption lower limit for
autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age was too high by one magnitude, even
before 020235a5754.
Discussion: 26377.1443105453@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: back to 9.0 (in parts), like the prior patch
---
src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c b/src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c
index b484685d173..999b0d9f1d9 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/common/reloptions.c
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static relopt_int intRelOpts[] =
"Age at which to autovacuum a table to prevent transaction ID wraparound",
RELOPT_KIND_HEAP | RELOPT_KIND_TOAST
},
- -1, 100000000, 2000000000
+ -1, 100000, 2000000000
},
{
{
--
GitLab