From 93be0950070b5bcb22600cb1cbb62f93c058a5dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 13:08:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Move comment about sun cc's __machine_rw_barrier being a full
 barrier.

I'd accidentally written the comment besides the read barrier, instead
of the full barrier, implementation.

Noticed by Oskari Saarenmaa
---
 src/include/port/atomics/generic-sunpro.h | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/include/port/atomics/generic-sunpro.h b/src/include/port/atomics/generic-sunpro.h
index a024c50d646..b756fb979ce 100644
--- a/src/include/port/atomics/generic-sunpro.h
+++ b/src/include/port/atomics/generic-sunpro.h
@@ -25,14 +25,14 @@
 #define pg_compiler_barrier_impl()	__compiler_barrier()
 
 #ifndef pg_memory_barrier_impl
-#	define pg_memory_barrier_impl()		__machine_rw_barrier()
-#endif
-#ifndef pg_read_barrier_impl
 /*
- * Despite the name this is actually a full barrier. Expanding to mfence and
+ * Despite the name this is actually a full barrier. Expanding to mfence/
  * membar #StoreStore | #LoadStore | #StoreLoad | #LoadLoad on x86/sparc
  * respectively.
  */
+#	define pg_memory_barrier_impl()		__machine_rw_barrier()
+#endif
+#ifndef pg_read_barrier_impl
 #	define pg_read_barrier_impl()		__machine_r_barrier()
 #endif
 #ifndef pg_write_barrier_impl
-- 
GitLab