From 793739180735a062d9eadec9ad03dbd5db11e5c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 21:29:02 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] doc: fix for plurality typo on bgwriter doc sentence
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191106022353.GX4999@telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: 11, 12
---
doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml
index 2bfc6eb9439..ad17b42c898 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/bgworker.sgml
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
There are considerable robustness and security risks in using background
worker processes because, being written in the <literal>C</literal> language,
they have unrestricted access to data. Administrators wishing to enable
- modules that include background worker processs should exercise extreme
+ modules that include background worker processes should exercise extreme
caution. Only carefully audited modules should be permitted to run
background worker processes.
</para>
--
GitLab