From 59b0a98af07cf8decfe94739f92bf18ebb34ffc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:51:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix minor copy & pasto in the int128 accumulator patch.
It's unlikely that using PG_GETARG_INT16 instead of PG_GETARG_INT32 in
this pace can cause actual problems, but this still should be fixed.
---
src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c
index ff9bfcc455c..0c4fcbe0d34 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c
@@ -3019,7 +3019,7 @@ int2_accum(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
if (!PG_ARGISNULL(1))
{
#ifdef HAVE_INT128
- do_int128_accum(state, (int128) PG_GETARG_INT32(1));
+ do_int128_accum(state, (int128) PG_GETARG_INT16(1));
#else
Numeric newval;
--
GitLab