From 48c9fbd35c02346cb88d684dd6f275bac6c26cd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:06:43 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update random test description because it fails less
frequently now.
---
doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml
index 95ee42b65e9..ed3f7ad019c 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml,v 1.37 2003/11/29 19:51:37 pgsql Exp $ -->
+<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/regress.sgml,v 1.38 2004/03/15 16:06:43 momjian Exp $ -->
<chapter id="regress">
<title id="regress-title">Regression Tests</title>
@@ -334,17 +334,13 @@ exclusion of those that don't.
<para>
There is at least one case in the <literal>random</literal> test
script that is intended to produce random results. This causes
- random to fail the regression test once in a while (perhaps once
- in every five to ten trials). Typing
+ random to fail the regression test occasionally. Typing
<programlisting>
diff results/random.out expected/random.out
</programlisting>
should produce only one or a few lines of differences. You need
not worry unless the random test always fails in repeated
- attempts. (On the other hand, if the random test is
- <emphasis>never</emphasis> reported to fail even in many trials
- of the regression tests, you probably <emphasis>should</emphasis>
- worry.)
+ attempts.
</para>
</sect2>
</sect1>
--
GitLab