From 3e9960e9d935e7e7c12e78441f99befc877563ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:08:19 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Revert ill-considered change of index-size fudge factor. This partially reverts commit 21a39de5809cd3050a37d2554323cc1d0cbeed9d, restoring the pre-9.2 cost estimates for index usage. That change introduced much too large a bias against larger indexes, as per reports from Jeff Janes and others. The whole thing needs a rewrite, which I've done in HEAD, but the safest thing to do in 9.2 is just to undo this multiplier change. --- src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c index fb91d140261..4b1229484ee 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c @@ -6130,11 +6130,11 @@ genericcostestimate(PlannerInfo *root, * * We can deal with this by adding a very small "fudge factor" that * depends on the index size. The fudge factor used here is one - * spc_random_page_cost per 10000 index pages, which should be small + * spc_random_page_cost per 100000 index pages, which should be small * enough to not alter index-vs-seqscan decisions, but will prevent * indexes of different sizes from looking exactly equally attractive. */ - *indexTotalCost += index->pages * spc_random_page_cost / 10000.0; + *indexTotalCost += index->pages * spc_random_page_cost / 100000.0; /* * CPU cost: any complex expressions in the indexquals will need to be -- GitLab