From 30c52532d2fe9dfc915ae1292f03adf7d033816b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:07:42 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Comment said we don't free the lockarray, and why. The proper
 fix is to make the code do what the comment says...

---
 src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c
index 6e421b92d97..7aa2ca508c1 100644
--- a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c
+++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
  *
  *
  * IDENTIFICATION
- *	  $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c,v 1.112 2008/12/04 02:52:31 momjian Exp $
+ *	  $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c,v 1.113 2008/12/04 14:07:42 mha Exp $
  *
  * NOTES
  *
@@ -918,8 +918,6 @@ destroy_ssl_system(void)
 			 * This means we leak a little memory on repeated load/unload
 			 * of the library.
 			 */
-			free(pq_lockarray);
-			pq_lockarray = NULL;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
GitLab