From 15f2f2759ecd0c2cf2a72644f3b1407478876968 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Munro <tmunro@postgresql.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 14:19:54 +1200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix documentation for pgbench tpcb-like.
We choose a random value for delta, not balance. Back-patch to 9.6 where
the mistake arrived.
Author: Fabien Coelho
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.21.1904081752210.5867@lancre
---
doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml
index 01ee5546a34..8ff48cac4ed 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pgbench.sgml
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ pgbench <optional> <replaceable>options</> </optional> <replaceable>dbname</>
<para>
The default built-in transaction script (also invoked with <option>-b tpcb-like</>)
issues seven commands per transaction over randomly chosen <literal>aid</>,
- <literal>tid</>, <literal>bid</> and <literal>balance</>.
+ <literal>tid</>, <literal>bid</> and <literal>delta</>.
The scenario is inspired by the TPC-B benchmark, but is not actually TPC-B,
hence the name.
</para>
--
GitLab